Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Materialise NV
How Materialise NV stacks up
MTLS · against 561 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
41/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #304 of 562 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score45 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including MTLS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 41?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 64% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.5% vs peer median 2.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.0% vs peer median 2.2%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 78% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.6% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MTLS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MTLS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 544 reported | 3.7% | 1.4% | 65% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 579 reported | 9.3% | 3.9% | 75% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 176 reported | 4.8% | 2.1% | 62% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 553 reported | 70.6% | 44.6% | 76% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MTLS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 763M USD | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 404M USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 304 | 4.3B CNY (≈$597M) | 41 | 74 | |
| 304 | 5.1B CNY (≈$711M) | 41 | 64 | |
| 304 | 352M USD | 41 | 56 | |
| 304 | 679M USD | 41 | 43 | |
| 304 | 411M USD | 41 | 36 | |
| 310 | 5.2B CNY (≈$728M) | 40 | 39 | |
| 310 | 283M USD | 40 | 22 | |
| 312 | 4.1B CNY (≈$573M) | 39 | 45 | |
| 312 | 10.2B TWD (≈$316M) | 39 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score