Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Materialise NV
How Materialise NV stacks up
MTLS · against 478 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Growth
18/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #443 of 479 · scores higher than 7% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score23 peers with a growth score of 10–19, including MTLS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 18?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 96% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -71.3% vs peer median 11.1%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 72% of peers. Revenue growth: 0.3% vs peer median 8.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.9% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MTLS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MTLS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | 0.3% | 13.1% | 14% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 286 reported | -71.3% | 22.4% | 5% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 471 reported | 4.9% | 9.7% | 37% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MTLS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 965.7B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 440 | 1.2B USD | 21 | 21 | |
| 441 | 21.3B USD | 20 | 59 | |
| 442 | 2.6B USD | 19 | 47 | |
| 443 | 1.8B USD | 18 | 30 | |
| 443 | 411M USD | 18 | 36 | |
| 443 | 4.1B USD | 18 | 67 | |
| 446 | 1.7B USD | 17 | 52 | |
| 446 | 255M USD | 17 | 54 | |
| 448 | 1.4B USD | 15 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score