Ranked #154 of 225 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score
24 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including MTG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 33?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 67% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 4.3% vs peer median 16.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MTG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
MTG
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Revenue growthHigher is better · 239 reported
-1.9%
9.4%
12%
Context only
Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 219 reported
4.3%
17.7%
31%
100%
3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 232 reported
1.0%
9.0%
11%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
