Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MTB · against 112 other Banks & Insurance companies of similar size
Ranked #30 of 113 · scores higher than 73% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score9 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including MTB · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Banks & Insurance norm.
| Metric | MTB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 112 reported | 8.5% | 8.5% | 49% | 60% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 32 reported | Not reported | 9.9% | — | — | Context only |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 58 reported | 11.2% | 7.3% | 72% | Context only | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 109 reported | 79.3% | 67.5% | 63% | 40% |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 134.4B HKD (≈$17.2B) | 98 | 44 | |
| 2 | 169.0B HKD (≈$21.6B) | 97 | ||
| 3 | 336.1B CNY (≈$47.0B) | 91 | 52 | |
| 3 | 133.9B HKD (≈$17.1B) | 91 | 63 | |
| 3 | 541.0B TRY (≈$16.2B) | 91 | 78 | |
| 27 | 33.2B EUR (≈$36.5B) | 71 | 56 | |
| 28 | 28.3B USD | 69 | 85 | |
| 29 | 20.1B EUR (≈$22.2B) | 67 | 41 | |
| 30 | 23.5B USD | 66 | 60 | |
| 30 | 32.1B USD | 66 | 60 | |
| 32 | 37.9B USD | 64 | 70 | |
| 33 | 22.7B USD | 62 | 67 | |
| 33 | 41.0B USD | 62 | 65 | |
| 33 | 483.4B ZAR (≈$26.6B) | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score