Ranked #61 of 110 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
16 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including MTB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Its metrics sit close to the Banks & Insurance norm.
●Return on equity is close to the peer norm. Return on equity: 10.9% vs peer median 10.7%
▲a higher return on assets: stronger than 62% of peers. Return on assets: 1.4% vs peer median 1.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MTB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
MTB
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 84 reported
12.7%
10.7%
61%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 9 reported
Not reported
13.7%
—
—
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 110 reported
1.4%
1.1%
60%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 110 reported
10.7%
13.9%
28%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 114 reported
0.0%
0.0%
0%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
