Ranked #33 of 107 · scores higher than 69% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score
8 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including MTB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 59?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Its metrics sit close to the Banks & Insurance norm.
●Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 21.5% vs peer median 16.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MTB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
MTB
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Revenue growthHigher is better · 113 reported
6.4%
5.1%
57%
Context only
Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 106 reported
21.5%
8.0%
70%
100%
3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 111 reported
6.3%
8.5%
32%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
