Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.
How Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. stacks up
MSGE · against 105 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Profitability
82/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #23 of 106 · scores higher than 77% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score16 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including MSGE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 82?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital and operating margin, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 3.4% vs peer median 2.7%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 64% of peers. Operating margin: 13.3% vs peer median 8.2%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 92% of peers. Return on invested capital: 34.6% vs peer median 6.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MSGE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MSGE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 96 reported | 34.6% | 8.4% | 91% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 106 reported | 13.3% | 12.7% | 52% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 104 reported | 3.4% | 3.6% | 49% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 101 reported | 407.5% | 8.6% | 100% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 107 reported | 47.3% | 50.0% | 43% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MSGE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.2B GBP (≈$5.4B) | 99 | 68 | |
| 1 | 3.9B GBP (≈$5.1B) | 99 | 68 | |
| 3 | 736.3B JPY (≈$5.0B) | 98 | 69 | |
| 3 | 385.6B JPY (≈$2.6B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.0B USD | 98 | 69 | |
| 21 | 18.7B ILS (≈$5.0B) | 83 | 51 | |
| 21 | 3.8B NZD (≈$2.3B) | 83 | 69 | |
| 23 | 16.0B CNY (≈$2.2B) | 82 | 62 | |
| 23 | 31.3B MYR (≈$6.9B) | 82 | 64 | |
| 23 | 3.8B USD | 82 | 50 | |
| 26 | 3.8B USD | 81 | 54 | |
| 27 | 505.7B JPY (≈$3.4B) | 80 | 71 | |
| 27 | 5.4B EUR (≈$5.9B) | 80 | 52 | |
| 27 | 3.1B USD | 80 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score