Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Middlesex Water Company
How Middlesex Water Company stacks up
MSEX · against 100 other Utilities companies of similar size
Growth
91/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #9 of 101 · scores higher than 92% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score10 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including MSEX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 91?
Weighted metrics compared with all Utilities companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Utilities peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 1.7%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.2% vs peer median 2.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 76% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.2% vs peer median 2.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MSEX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MSEX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 101 reported | 5.2% | 1.0% | 71% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 78 reported | -4.5% | -0.6% | 44% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 101 reported | 7.2% | 1.7% | 75% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MSEX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.9B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 85 | |
| 1 | 636M EUR (≈$700M) | 99 | 64 | |
| 3 | 1.5B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 4 | 1.6B GBP (≈$2.1B) | 97 | 52 | |
| 5 | 13.0B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 95 | 60 | |
| 6 | 7.3B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 94 | 74 | |
| 7 | 8.2B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 93 | 60 | |
| 8 | 584M USD | 92 | 25 | |
| 9 | 1.1B USD | 91 | 42 | |
| 10 | 5.7B NOK (≈$543M) | 90 | 37 | |
| 11 | 15.2B CNY (≈$2.1B) | 88 | 76 | |
| 12 | 14.2B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 85 | 42 | |
| 13 | 710M USD | 82 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score