Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Millrose Properties, Inc.
How Millrose Properties, Inc. stacks up
MRP · against 140 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
93/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #2 of 141 · scores higher than 99% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score3 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including MRP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 93?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- EBITDA yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 76% of peers. Earnings yield: 11.1% vs peer median 5.3%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 99% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 107.1% vs peer median 6.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MRP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MRP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 145 reported | 10.8% | 5.0% | 85% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 140 reported | Not reported | 5.5% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 67 reported | 107.1% | 6.6% | 100% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 147 reported | 136.1% | 95.4% | 73% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MRP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9B USD | 96 | 67 | |
| 2 | 4.3B USD | 93 | 94 | |
| 3 | 1.10T JPY (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 82 | |
| 4 | 12.2B BRL (≈$2.2B) | 89 | 83 | |
| 4 | 2.9B USD | 89 | 68 | |
| 6 | 880.1B JPY (≈$6.0B) | 84 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score