Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MRAM · against 478 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #130 of 479 · scores higher than 73% of peers · safety percentile 77
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)53 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including MRAM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MRAM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 454 reported | 0.04× | 0.23× | 76% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 460 reported | 1.89 | 0.67 | 4% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 482 reported | 4.74× | 1.93× | 89% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 2 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 3 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 4 | 308M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 5 | 553M EUR (≈$608M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 126 | 40.7B JPY (≈$277M) | 77 | 83 | |
| 127 | 2.7B CNY (≈$382M) | 77 | 33 | |
| 128 | 3.2B CNY (≈$448M) | 77 | 61 | |
| 129 | 1.2B MYR (≈$260M) | 77 | 26 | |
| 130 | 330M USD | 77 | 33 | |
| 131 | 67.2B JPY (≈$457M) | 77 | 92 | |
| 132 | 8.7B TWD (≈$270M) | 76 | 64 | |
| 133 | 77.4B JPY (≈$526M) | 76 | 75 | |
| 134 | 6.7B TWD (≈$207M) | 76 | 47 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score