Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Marqeta, Inc.
How Marqeta, Inc. stacks up
MQ · against 468 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
46/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #256 of 469 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score49 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including MQ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 46?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker EBITDA yield and earnings yield than most Technology peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 72% of peers. EBITDA yield: 1.5% vs peer median 4.2%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 70% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.6% vs peer median 2.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 87% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 10.7% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MQ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MQ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 463 reported | 0.6% | 2.4% | 28% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 473 reported | 1.5% | 4.5% | 24% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 177 reported | 9.0% | 3.2% | 84% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 465 reported | 38.6% | 32.0% | 63% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MQ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 1.7B USD | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 27.5B HKD (≈$3.5B) | 98 | 81 | |
| 3 | 16.7B HKD (≈$2.1B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 3 | 117.8B TWD (≈$3.7B) | 98 | 94 | |
| 256 | 14.6B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 46 | 63 | |
| 256 | 24.7B SEK (≈$2.5B) | 46 | 56 | |
| 256 | 9.9B SEK (≈$985M) | 46 | 68 | |
| 256 | 2.9B USD | 46 | 65 | |
| 256 | 1.9B USD | 46 | 48 | |
| 256 | 1.6B EUR (≈$1.7B) | 46 | 60 | |
| 263 | 48.3B TWD (≈$1.5B) | 45 | 39 | |
| 263 | 17.2B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 45 | 38 | |
| 263 | 39.3B TWD (≈$1.2B) | 45 | 81 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score