Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MQ · against 471 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #245 of 472 · scores higher than 48% of peers · safety percentile 51
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)59 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including MQ · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MQ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 461 reported | 0.01× | 0.22× | 92% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 453 reported | 1.21 | 0.83 | 28% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 468 reported | 1.66× | 1.89× | 41% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 241 | 97.9B TWD (≈$3.0B) | 52 | 73 | |
| 242 | 470.4B JPY (≈$3.2B) | 52 | 66 | |
| 243 | 1.4B GBP (≈$1.9B) | 52 | 61 | |
| 244 | 1.2B USD | 52 | 25 | |
| 245 | 1.9B USD | 51 | 48 | |
| 246 | 231.5B JPY (≈$1.6B) | 51 | 81 | |
| 247 | 1.5B GBP (≈$1.9B) | 51 | 64 | |
| 248 | 204.5B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 51 | 68 | |
| 249 | 17.2B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 51 | 38 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score