Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MPLX LP
How MPLX LP stacks up
MPLX · against 36 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
38/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #23 of 37 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score8 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including MPLX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 38?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 79% of peers. EBITDA yield: 7.3% vs peer median 12.1%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.7% vs peer median 6.2%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 68% of peers. Earnings yield: 8.2% vs peer median 5.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MPLX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MPLX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 38 reported | 8.1% | 7.2% | 68% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 36 reported | 7.3% | 11.0% | 20% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 31 reported | 5.7% | 5.9% | 47% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 35 reported | 24.1% | 39.1% | 24% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MPLX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.92T INR (≈$35.0B) | 86 | 56 | |
| 2 | 2.51T INR (≈$30.2B) | 84 | 76 | |
| 3 | 4.69T JPY (≈$31.9B) | 80 | 67 | |
| 4 | 108.0B USD | 79 | 55 | |
| 5 | 60.4B USD | 77 | 77 | |
| 20 | 111.6B USD | 43 | 70 | |
| 21 | 81.0B USD | 41 | 47 | |
| 22 | 52.4B USD | 39 | 47 | |
| 23 | 64.3B USD | 38 | 43 | |
| 23 | 58.3B USD | 38 | 51 | |
| 25 | 109.0B USD | 35 | 58 | |
| 26 | 58.0B USD | 34 | 48 | |
| 27 | 66.8B USD | 32 | 49 | |
| 28 | 53.9B USD | 31 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score