Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MPLX LP
How MPLX LP stacks up
MPLX · against 37 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
65/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #14 of 38 · scores higher than 65% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score8 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including MPLX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 65?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 10.1% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 68% of peers. Revenue growth: 8.7% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 70% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 4.9% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MPLX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MPLX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 38 reported | 8.7% | 7.7% | 51% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 38 reported | 10.1% | 4.3% | 57% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 38 reported | 4.9% | -1.2% | 70% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MPLX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 31.6B USD | 96 | 56 | |
| 2 | 109.0B USD | 94 | 58 | |
| 3 | 111.6B USD | 92 | 70 | |
| 4 | 33.9B USD | 91 | 71 | |
| 4 | 58.0B USD | 91 | 48 | |
| 10 | 110.5B USD | 73 | 61 | |
| 10 | 81.4B USD | 73 | 78 | |
| 12 | 73.2B USD | 69 | 44 | |
| 13 | 88.6B USD | 66 | 40 | |
| 14 | 58.3B USD | 65 | 51 | |
| 15 | 81.0B USD | 63 | 47 | |
| 16 | 30.5B USD | 62 | 57 | |
| 16 | 52.4B USD | 62 | 57 | |
| 18 | 404.0B BRL (≈$72.7B) | 61 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score