Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MOMO · against 145 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Ranked #10 of 146 · scores higher than 94% of peers · safety percentile 94
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)17 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including MOMO · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Communication Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MOMO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 133 reported | 0.01× | 0.31× | 93% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 142 reported | 0.54 | 0.63 | 61% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 142 reported | 5.13× | 1.43× | 89% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 82.4B JPY (≈$560M) | 100 | 76 | |
| 2 | 17.62T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 56.0B JPY (≈$381M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 4 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 98 | 58 | |
| 5 | 2.5B HKD (≈$316M) | 97 | 70 | |
| 6 | 1.07T KRW (≈$770M) | 96 | 85 | |
| 7 | 3.2B CNY (≈$452M) | 96 | 57 | |
| 8 | 2.5B CNY (≈$352M) | 96 | 48 | |
| 9 | 5.5B CNY (≈$773M) | 94 | 27 | |
| 10 | 631M USD | 94 | 71 | |
| 11 | 2.8B HKD (≈$353M) | 93 | 83 | |
| 12 | 474M USD | 93 | 68 | |
| 13 | 454M EUR (≈$499M) | 93 | 71 | |
| 14 | 659M USD | 92 | 81 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score