Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MOD · against 240 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #146 of 241 · scores higher than 40% of peers · safety percentile 30
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)28 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including MOD · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MOD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 232 reported | 0.55× | 0.62× | 54% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 237 reported | 1.71 | 0.87 | 7% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 234 reported | 2.04× | 1.46× | 76% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.7B EUR (≈$4.1B) | 98 | 82 | |
| 2 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 3 | 7.3B SGD (≈$5.5B) | 97 | 69 | |
| 4 | 514.3B JPY (≈$3.5B) | 96 | 80 | |
| 5 | 9.5B CHF (≈$10.9B) | 96 | 37 | |
| 142 | 7.0B USD | 31 | 46 | |
| 143 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 30 | 61 | |
| 144 | 7.5B USD | 30 | 48 | |
| 145 | 3.7B USD | 30 | 41 | |
| 146 | 6.7B USD | 30 | 52 | |
| 147 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 30 | 64 | |
| 148 | 32.8B CNY (≈$4.6B) | 29 | 47 | |
| 149 | 6.2B USD | 28 | 60 | |
| 150 | 3.6B USD | 28 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score