Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MINISO Group Holding Limited
How MINISO Group Holding Limited stacks up
MNSO · against 336 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
49/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #185 of 337 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score45 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including MNSO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield and earnings yield, but weaker free cash flow yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 64% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 3.9% vs peer median 6.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 79% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.2% vs peer median 8.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MNSO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MNSO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 336 reported | 6.0% | 5.4% | 60% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 344 reported | 14.7% | 9.5% | 83% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 136 reported | Not reported | 5.8% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 339 reported | 53.1% | 44.4% | 57% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MNSO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 248.4B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 3 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 3 | 8.6B BRL (≈$1.5B) | 97 | 81 | |
| 5 | 12.1B HKD (≈$1.6B) | 96 | 56 | |
| 178 | 4.2B USD | 50 | 56 | |
| 185 | 23.7B CNY (≈$3.3B) | 49 | 68 | |
| 185 | 2.2B USD | 49 | 64 | |
| 185 | 3.2B USD | 49 | 46 | |
| 185 | 3.0B USD | 49 | 60 | |
| 189 | 400.9B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 48 | 68 | |
| 189 | 4.6B USD | 48 | 44 | |
| 189 | 1.5B USD | 48 | 44 | |
| 189 | 109.3B TRY (≈$3.3B) | 48 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score