Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MINISO Group Holding Limited
How MINISO Group Holding Limited stacks up
MNSO · against 345 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
83/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #65 of 346 · scores higher than 80% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score45 peers with a profitability score of 80–89, including MNSO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 83?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital, operating margin and return on assets, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 61% of peers. Return on assets: 4.2% vs peer median 3.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 84% of peers. Operating margin: 15.4% vs peer median 6.4%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 88% of peers. Return on invested capital: 23.8% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MNSO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MNSO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 327 reported | 23.8% | 9.6% | 90% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 346 reported | 15.4% | 8.8% | 82% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 329 reported | 4.2% | 4.3% | 48% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 314 reported | 11.8% | 11.4% | 53% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 349 reported | 44.9% | 31.5% | 72% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MNSO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 106.7B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 2 | 4.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 2 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 393.5B INR (≈$4.7B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 58 | 4.7B USD | 84 | 61 | |
| 65 | 20.0B CNY (≈$2.8B) | 83 | 58 | |
| 65 | 3.5B USD | 83 | 73 | |
| 65 | 5.1B USD | 83 | 57 | |
| 65 | 3.0B USD | 83 | 60 | |
| 65 | 2.6B CAD (≈$1.9B) | 83 | 73 | |
| 70 | 37.4B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 82 | 75 | |
| 70 | 4.0B USD | 82 | 64 | |
| 70 | 22.1B SEK (≈$2.2B) | 82 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score