Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MINISO Group Holding Limited
How MINISO Group Holding Limited stacks up
MNSO · against 345 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
58/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #153 of 346 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score46 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including MNSO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger revenue growth, but weaker earnings per share growth than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 97% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -76.8% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 93% of peers. Revenue growth: 26.2% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MNSO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MNSO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 346 reported | 26.2% | 4.5% | 94% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 289 reported | -76.8% | 7.5% | 1% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 344 reported | Not reported | 5.2% | — | — | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MNSO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 1 | 3.1B USD | 100 | 59 | |
| 3 | 27.1B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 99 | 35 | |
| 3 | 272.3B INR (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 5 | 17.6B SAR (≈$4.8B) | 98 | 68 | |
| 153 | 24.2B CNY (≈$3.4B) | 58 | 29 | |
| 153 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score