Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MINISO Group Holding Limited
How MINISO Group Holding Limited stacks up
MNSO · against 355 other Consumer Cyclical companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
49/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #159 of 356 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score51 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including MNSO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 49?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger EBITDA yield and earnings yield, but weaker free cash flow yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 63% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 3.9% vs peer median 5.9%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 65% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.9% vs peer median 4.3%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 79% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.0% vs peer median 8.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MNSO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MNSO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 5.9% | 4.0% | 73% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 359 reported | 14.4% | 8.1% | 91% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 325 reported | Not reported | 5.1% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 352 reported | 52.0% | 34.8% | 63% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MNSO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.5B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 8.3B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 3 | 425M USD | 96 | 59 | |
| 3 | 6.7B USD | 96 | 60 | |
| 3 | 87M USD | 96 | 79 | |
| 152 | 487M USD | 50 | 30 | |
| 152 | 3.5B USD | 50 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score