Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MannKind Corporation
How MannKind Corporation stacks up
MNKD · against 420 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Growth
76/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #96 of 421 · scores higher than 76% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score43 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including MNKD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 76?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 9.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 86% of peers. Revenue growth: 30.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 89% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 35.5% vs peer median 5.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MNKD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MNKD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 427 reported | 30.5% | 5.2% | 88% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 238 reported | -80.0% | 7.4% | 3% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 413 reported | 35.5% | 5.8% | 89% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MNKD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.9B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 99 | 73 | |
| 1 | 2.1B USD | 99 | 96 | |
| 1 | 885M USD | 99 | 33 | |
| 1 | 15.6B DKK (≈$2.3B) | 99 | 96 | |
| 92 | 1.8B USD | 77 | 31 | |
| 92 | 1.1B USD | 77 | 32 | |
| 96 | 748M USD | 76 | 62 | |
| 96 | 1.1B CAD (≈$807M) | 76 | 60 | |
| 96 | 1.2B USD | 76 | 39 | |
| 96 | 660M GBP (≈$858M) | 76 | 35 | |
| 96 | 1.5B USD | 76 | 59 | |
| 101 | 1.2B USD | 75 | 36 | |
| 101 | 31.3B TRY (≈$938M) | 75 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score