Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to monday.com Ltd.
How monday.com Ltd. stacks up
MNDY · against 372 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
99/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #3 of 373 · scores higher than 98% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score44 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including MNDY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 99?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 84% of peers. Revenue growth: 26.7% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 94% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 264.0% vs peer median 11.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 96% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 33.4% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MNDY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MNDY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 374 reported | 26.7% | 10.7% | 82% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 250 reported | 264.0% | 11.9% | 94% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 371 reported | 33.4% | 6.0% | 95% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MNDY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 3 | 21.5B CNY (≈$3.0B) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 37.9B CNY (≈$5.3B) | 99 | 58 | |
| 3 | 6.0B USD | 99 | 83 | |
| 3 | 2.3B USD | 99 | 60 | |
| 3 | 3.8B USD | 99 | 74 | |
| 3 | 3.7B USD | 99 | 71 | |
| 3 | 4.0B USD | 99 | 60 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 99 | 86 | |
| 11 | 2.0B USD | 98 | 35 | |
| 11 | 3.4B USD | 98 | 52 | |
| 13 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 97 | 97 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score