Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to 3M Company
How 3M Company stacks up
MMM · against 65 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
44/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #23 of 66 · scores higher than 66% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score21 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including MMM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.3% vs peer median 3.8%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.0% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.4% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MMM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MMM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 66 reported | 3.2% | 3.2% | 48% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 66 reported | 6.5% | 5.5% | 78% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 52 reported | 4.4% | 3.3% | 69% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 64 reported | 3.2% | 16.5% | 6% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MMM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60.0B EUR (≈$66.0B) | 83 | 54 | |
| 2 | 1.15T CNY (≈$161.5B) | 79 | 79 | |
| 3 | 71.0B USD | 78 | 68 | |
| 4 | 54.8B USD | 73 | 49 | |
| 4 | 318.3B DKK (≈$47.7B) | 73 | 45 | |
| 19 | 75.7B USD | 47 | 48 | |
| 20 | 46.8B USD | 46 | 52 | |
| 20 | 51.7B USD | 46 | 58 | |
| 22 | 180.3B USD | 45 | 49 | |
| 23 | 91.3B USD | 44 | 45 | |
| 24 | 153.0B EUR (≈$168.3B) | 43 | 51 | |
| 24 | 93.8B USD | 43 | 47 | |
| 26 | 94.0B USD | 42 | 44 | |
| 26 | 47.9B EUR (≈$52.7B) | 42 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score