Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Marcus & Millichap, Inc.
How Marcus & Millichap, Inc. stacks up
MMI · against 231 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
16/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #191 of 232 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score23 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including MMI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 16?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 80% of peers. EBITDA yield: 2.2% vs peer median 5.4%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 72% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.3% vs peer median 5.3%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.9% vs peer median 6.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MMI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MMI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 250 reported | 1.3% | 5.8% | 28% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 227 reported | 2.2% | 5.5% | 18% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 92 reported | 7.9% | 7.6% | 53% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 252 reported | 53.8% | 114.0% | 13% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MMI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 2 | 9.23T IDR (≈$572M) | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 12.33T IDR (≈$764M) | 99 | 85 | |
| 4 | 139.5B JPY (≈$949M) | 97 | 81 | |
| 4 | 5.8B HKD (≈$737M) | 97 | 86 | |
| 188 | 1.8B EUR (≈$2.0B) | 18 | 28 | |
| 188 | 743M SGD (≈$565M) | 18 | 41 | |
| 188 | 1.9B CAD (≈$1.4B) | 18 | 27 | |
| 191 | 42.0B THB (≈$1.2B) | 16 | 27 | |
| 191 | 1.1B USD | 16 | 50 | |
| 193 | 227.1B JPY (≈$1.5B) | 15 | 44 | |
| 193 | 122.7B INR (≈$1.5B) | 15 | 55 | |
| 195 | 6.7B SAR (≈$1.8B) | 14 | 53 | |
| 195 | 13.4B CNY (≈$1.9B) | 14 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score