Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Marcus & Millichap, Inc.
How Marcus & Millichap, Inc. stacks up
MMI · against 254 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Profitability
28/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #191 of 255 · scores higher than 23% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score25 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including MMI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 28?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 86% of peers. Operating margin: 1.2% vs peer median 26.8%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 72% of peers. Return on invested capital: 1.8% vs peer median 3.4%
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 1.9% vs peer median 2.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MMI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MMI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 250 reported | 1.8% | 3.5% | 25% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 243 reported | 1.2% | 33.2% | 11% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 251 reported | 1.9% | 2.2% | 43% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 248 reported | 2.4% | 5.5% | 36% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 256 reported | 37.7% | 57.1% | 31% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MMI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17.42T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 83 | |
| 2 | 44.3B TWD (≈$1.4B) | 99 | 94 | |
| 2 | 7.7B BRL (≈$1.4B) | 99 | 90 | |
| 2 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 91 | |
| 5 | 314.6B JPY (≈$2.1B) | 97 | 75 | |
| 191 | 6.7B SAR (≈$1.8B) | 28 | 53 | |
| 191 | 1.1B USD | 28 | 43 | |
| 191 | 14.3B MXN (≈$772M) | 28 | 51 | |
| 191 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 28 | 57 | |
| 191 | 1.1B USD | 28 | 50 | |
| 191 | 1.8B USD | 28 | 60 | |
| 197 | 5.0B HKD (≈$634M) | 27 | 34 | |
| 198 | 1.2B USD | 26 | 21 | |
| 198 | 1.3B USD | 26 | 14 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score