Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Miller Industries, Inc.
How Miller Industries, Inc. stacks up
MLR · against 621 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
51/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #297 of 622 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score54 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including MLR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.A mix: stronger free cash flow yield, but weaker earnings yield and EBITDA yield than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 66% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.4% vs peer median 4.4%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 61% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.9% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 88% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 19.0% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MLR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MLR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 616 reported | 2.4% | 3.6% | 40% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 634 reported | 6.9% | 8.7% | 41% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 158 reported | 19.0% | 8.0% | 85% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 617 reported | 70.8% | 61.8% | 57% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MLR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 4 | 3.2B HKD (≈$408M) | 99 | 79 | |
| 4 | 3.9B HKD (≈$498M) | 99 | 74 | |
| 297 | 2.2B CNY (≈$311M) | 51 | 35 | |
| 297 | 112.3B JPY (≈$764M) | 51 | 36 | |
| 297 | 139.3B JPY (≈$947M) | 51 | 54 | |
| 297 | 459M USD | 51 | 38 | |
| 297 | 593M USD | 51 | 40 | |
| 304 | 5.4B CNY (≈$759M) | 50 | 72 | |
| 304 | 6.5B CNY (≈$908M) | 50 | 67 | |
| 304 | 617M GBP (≈$803M) | 50 | 67 | |
| 304 | 474M USD | 50 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score