Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MillerKnoll, Inc.
How MillerKnoll, Inc. stacks up
MLKN · against 477 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
39/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #327 of 478 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score49 peers with a profitability score of 30–39, including MLKN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 39?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 2.4% vs peer median 3.3%
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 5.2% vs peer median 6.4%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 6.3% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MLKN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MLKN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 454 reported | 6.3% | 8.5% | 39% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 478 reported | 5.2% | 7.3% | 34% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 454 reported | 2.4% | 3.7% | 35% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 444 reported | 7.3% | 9.2% | 42% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 480 reported | 39.6% | 31.4% | 66% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MLKN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 2.4B USD | 99 | 65 | |
| 3 | 404.0B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 90 | |
| 3 | 11.2B SEK (≈$1.1B) | 98 | 49 | |
| 5 | 122.9B JPY (≈$836M) | 97 | 83 | |
| 323 | 1.9B AUD (≈$1.3B) | 40 | 46 | |
| 327 | 178.5B JPY (≈$1.2B) | 39 | 57 | |
| 327 | 135.1B JPY (≈$918M) | 39 | 53 | |
| 327 | 39.3B TRY (≈$1.2B) | 39 | 55 | |
| 327 | 1.5B USD | 39 | 50 | |
| 331 | 1.60T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 38 | ||
| 331 | 9.3B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 38 | 44 | |
| 331 | 8.6B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 38 | 64 | |
| 334 | 13.7B HKD (≈$1.8B) | 37 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score