Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MillerKnoll, Inc.
How MillerKnoll, Inc. stacks up
MLKN · against 475 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
70/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #147 of 476 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score48 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including MLKN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 70?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 71% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -1.0% vs peer median 4.3%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 61% of peers. Revenue growth: 1.2% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share turned from a loss to a profit. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MLKN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MLKN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 476 reported | 1.2% | 3.8% | 37% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 368 reported | Not reported | 6.1% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 473 reported | -1.0% | 4.9% | 26% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MLKN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 2 | 7.2B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 99 | 87 | |
| 2 | 154.7B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 2 | 1.3B EUR (≈$1.4B) | 99 | 34 | |
| 5 | 9.9B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 82 | |
| 147 | 9.1B HKD (≈$1.2B) | 70 | 77 | |
| 147 | 139.3B JPY (≈$947M) | 70 | 54 | |
| 147 | 1.4B USD | 70 | 65 | |
| 147 | 1.2B EUR (≈$1.3B) | 70 | 69 | |
| 147 | 1.5B USD | 70 | 50 | |
| 147 | 2.2B USD | 70 | 64 | |
| 153 | 5.7B CNY (≈$801M) | 69 | 51 | |
| 153 | 230.2B JPY (≈$1.6B) | 69 | 61 | |
| 153 | 13.2B SEK (≈$1.3B) | 69 | 78 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score