Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MKS Inc.
How MKS Inc. stacks up
MKSI · against 184 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
70/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #83 of 185 · scores higher than 54% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score23 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including MKSI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 70?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.2% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 70% of peers. Revenue growth: 16.2% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 80% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 63.3% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MKSI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MKSI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 187 reported | 16.2% | 16.1% | 52% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 156 reported | 63.3% | 19.6% | 75% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 184 reported | 4.2% | 10.4% | 30% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MKSI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 835.6B TWD (≈$25.9B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 1 | 101.7B CNY (≈$14.2B) | 98 | 63 | |
| 1 | 23.2B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 1 | 20.1B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 1 | 13.3B USD | 98 | 50 | |
| 82 | 8.5B EUR (≈$9.3B) | 71 | 61 | |
| 83 | 92.1B CNY (≈$12.9B) | 70 | 51 | |
| 83 | 17.07T KRW (≈$12.3B) | 70 | 62 | |
| 83 | 11.2B USD | 70 | 42 | |
| 83 | 13.9B USD | 70 | 50 | |
| 87 | 53.0B CNY (≈$7.4B) | 69 | 50 | |
| 87 | 26.7B USD | 69 | 57 | |
| 87 | 9.6B USD | 69 | 75 | |
| 90 | 7.3B USD | 68 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score