Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Mitek Systems, Inc.
How Mitek Systems, Inc. stacks up
MITK · against 593 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
62/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #187 of 594 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score58 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including MITK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.3% vs peer median 4.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 11.1% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 75% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 47.0% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MITK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MITK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 600 reported | 11.1% | 6.2% | 65% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 357 reported | 47.0% | 6.7% | 78% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 591 reported | 4.3% | 3.6% | 53% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MITK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 3 | 9.3B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 99 | 55 | |
| 3 | 39.3B TWD (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 81 | |
| 3 | 3.4B CNY (≈$482M) | 99 | 91 | |
| 187 | 20.3B TWD (≈$631M) | 62 | 51 | |
| 187 | 4.7B CNY (≈$660M) | 62 | 35 | |
| 187 | 6.0B CNY (≈$834M) | 62 | 37 | |
| 187 | 679M USD | 62 | 43 | |
| 187 | 818M USD | 62 | 65 | |
| 193 | 7.0B CNY (≈$981M) | 61 | 56 | |
| 193 | 77.4B JPY (≈$526M) | 61 | 75 | |
| 193 | 4.6B CNY (≈$647M) | 61 | 63 | |
| 193 | 620M EUR (≈$682M) | 61 | 74 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score