Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Mitek Systems, Inc.
How Mitek Systems, Inc. stacks up
MITK · against 478 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Growth
62/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #260 of 479 · scores higher than 45% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score48 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including MITK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 62?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 4.3% vs peer median 4.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 11.1% vs peer median 8.5%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 75% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 47.0% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MITK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MITK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | 11.1% | 13.1% | 44% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 286 reported | 47.0% | 22.4% | 65% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 471 reported | 4.3% | 9.7% | 35% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MITK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 965.7B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 255 | 28.5B USD | 63 | 50 | |
| 255 | 15.0B USD | 63 | 47 | |
| 260 | 259M USD | 62 | 82 | |
| 260 | 679M USD | 62 | 43 | |
| 260 | 818M USD | 62 | 65 | |
| 260 | 10.4B USD | 62 | 41 | |
| 264 | 95.8B USD | 61 | 67 | |
| 264 | 2.6B USD | 61 | 24 | |
| 264 | 20.7B USD | 61 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score