Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MIST · against 89 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #64 of 90 · scores higher than 9% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score27 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including MIST · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | MIST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 74 reported | -85.6% | -13.1% | 18% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 99 reported | -97.8% | -3.5% | 14% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 68 reported | -65.2% | -14.9% | 18% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 79 reported | 17.0% | 71.5% | 19% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.1B HKD (≈$146M) | 99 | 72 | |
| 1 | 834M HKD (≈$107M) | 99 | 57 | |
| 1 | 1.4B HKD (≈$181M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 592M ILS (≈$160M) | 99 | 84 | |
| 1 | 212M AUD (≈$140M) | 99 | 61 | |
| 64 | 67M USD | 8 | ||
| 64 | 90M USD | 8 | 27 | |
| 64 | 172M USD | 8 | 3 | |
| 64 | 172M USD | 8 | 41 | |
| 64 | 94M USD | 8 | 8 | |
| 64 | 100M CHF (≈$115M) | 8 | ||
| 64 | 68M EUR (≈$75M) | 8 | 34 | |
| 64 | 79M EUR (≈$87M) | 8 | 34 | |
| 64 | 649M SEK (≈$65M) | 8 | 29 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score