Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MIST · against 105 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #85 of 106 · scores higher than 20% of peers · safety percentile 14
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including MIST · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MIST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 92 reported | 7.79× | 0.23× | 0% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 101 reported | 0.98 | 0.70 | 36% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 107 reported | 8.13× | 2.96× | 84% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 2 | 165M USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 3 | 284M AUD (≈$188M) | 98 | 36 | |
| 4 | 8.4B JPY (≈$57M) | 98 | ||
| 5 | 5.7B TWD (≈$177M) | 97 | 65 | |
| 81 | 172.4B KRW (≈$124M) | 18 | 26 | |
| 82 | 913M HKD (≈$117M) | 17 | 43 | |
| 83 | 105.7B KRW (≈$76M) | 16 | 37 | |
| 84 | 37M GBP (≈$48M) | 15 | ||
| 85 | 94M USD | 14 | 8 | |
| 86 | 124M USD | 14 | 31 | |
| 87 | 82M USD | 11 | 27 | |
| 88 | 648M HKD (≈$83M) | 11 | ||
| 89 | 3.0B THB (≈$83M) | 10 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score