Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MIRM · against 223 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #174 of 224 · scores higher than 2% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score51 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including MIRM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Healthcare peers.
| Metric | MIRM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 221 reported | -16.2% | 2.5% | 2% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 222 reported | -1.2% | 4.5% | 21% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 125 reported | -4.7% | 1.0% | 17% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 223 reported | -0.2% | 24.5% | 3% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52.2B HKD (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 1 | 37.3B HKD (≈$4.8B) | 99 | 90 | |
| 3 | 428.3B JPY (≈$2.9B) | 98 | 59 | |
| 4 | 22.0B CNY (≈$3.1B) | 96 | 67 | |
| 4 | 10.4B USD | 96 | 64 | |
| 174 | 3.1B USD | 8 | 39 | |
| 174 | 6.2B USD | 8 | ||
| 174 | 4.2B USD | 8 | 44 | |
| 174 | 9.2B USD | 8 | 39 | |
| 174 | 5.7B USD | 8 | 30 | |
| 174 | 6.6B USD | 8 | 45 | |
| 174 | 9.0B USD | 8 | 33 | |
| 174 | 3.7B USD | 8 | 24 | |
| 174 | 7.8B USD | 8 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score