Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MIR · against 481 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #146 of 482 · scores higher than 70% of peers · safety percentile 59
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)59 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including MIR · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker beta and debt / equity than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MIR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 475 reported | 0.66× | 0.51× | 42% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 467 reported | 1.10 | 0.74 | 25% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 461 reported | 3.20× | 1.53× | 92% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.5B USD | 100 | 33 | |
| 2 | 5.7B USD | 99 | 36 | |
| 3 | 350.8B JPY (≈$2.4B) | 99 | 83 | |
| 4 | 28.9B CNY (≈$4.0B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 5 | 2.45T CLP (≈$2.7B) | 99 | ||
| 142 | 44.2B HKD (≈$5.7B) | 61 | 66 | |
| 143 | 4.4B USD | 60 | 56 | |
| 143 | 6.2B CAD (≈$4.5B) | 60 | 56 | |
| 145 | 2.9B USD | 60 | 44 | |
| 146 | 4.7B USD | 59 | 47 | |
| 147 | 82.6B NOK (≈$7.8B) | 59 | 74 | |
| 148 | 4.9B CAD (≈$3.6B) | 59 | 53 | |
| 149 | 509.8B JPY (≈$3.5B) | 58 | 53 | |
| 150 | 316.0B INR (≈$3.8B) | 58 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score