Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to The Magnum Ice Cream Company N.V.
How The Magnum Ice Cream Company N.V. stacks up
MICC · against 95 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Valuation
35/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #72 of 96 · scores higher than 24% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including MICC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 82% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.2% vs peer median 6.2%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 74% of peers. Earnings yield: 2.8% vs peer median 4.5%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 8.5% vs peer median 8.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MICC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MICC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 92 reported | 1.8% | 4.4% | 16% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 96 reported | 8.5% | 8.9% | 45% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 42 reported | Not reported | 6.7% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 90 reported | Not reported | 41.9% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MICC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56.3B HKD (≈$7.2B) | 95 | 71 | |
| 2 | 7.2B USD | 92 | 72 | |
| 3 | 9.3B EUR (≈$10.2B) | 87 | 36 | |
| 3 | 7.8B USD | 87 | 83 | |
| 5 | 379.9B MXN (≈$20.5B) | 84 | 68 | |
| 68 | 3.41T JPY (≈$23.2B) | 37 | 58 | |
| 68 | 29.1B AUD (≈$19.2B) | 37 | 37 | |
| 71 | 8.84T KRW (≈$6.4B) | 36 | 72 | |
| 72 | 18.2B USD | 35 | 43 | |
| 72 | 11.7B USD | 35 | 35 | |
| 74 | 11.7B USD | 34 | 38 | |
| 75 | 11.7B CAD (≈$8.6B) | 33 | 33 | |
| 75 | 21.9B USD | 33 | 40 | |
| 77 | 7.6B EUR (≈$8.4B) | 31 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score