Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to M/I Homes, Inc.
How M/I Homes, Inc. stacks up
MHO · against 326 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
72/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #88 of 327 · scores higher than 72% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score39 peers with a valuation score of 70–79, including MHO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 72?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.0% vs peer median 6.1%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 71% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.8% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 83% of peers. Earnings yield: 9.7% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MHO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MHO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 326 reported | 9.1% | 5.5% | 83% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 334 reported | 12.8% | 9.5% | 72% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 133 reported | 6.0% | 6.0% | 50% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 329 reported | 99.3% | 44.4% | 84% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MHO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 248.4B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 98 | 73 | |
| 4 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 4 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 88 | 300.2B JPY (≈$2.0B) | 72 | 59 | |
| 88 | 250.7B INR (≈$3.0B) | 72 | 70 | |
| 88 | 2.4B USD | 72 | 65 | |
| 88 | 5.4B AUD (≈$3.6B) | 72 | 58 | |
| 88 | 3.3B USD | 72 | 61 | |
| 88 | 2.2B EUR (≈$2.4B) | 72 | 42 | |
| 94 | 86.0B TWD (≈$2.7B) | 71 | 71 | |
| 94 | 369.1B JPY (≈$2.5B) | 71 | 44 | |
| 96 | 14.4B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 70 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score