Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MGY · against 104 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #36 of 105 · scores higher than 66% of peers · safety percentile 60
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)8 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including MGY · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MGY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 106 reported | 0.19× | 0.58× | 86% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 106 reported | 0.79 | 0.53 | 24% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 104 reported | 1.58× | 1.41× | 60% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.4B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 2 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 3 | 14.8B ILS (≈$4.0B) | 97 | 63 | |
| 4 | 3.6B USD | 94 | 77 | |
| 5 | 7.5B AUD (≈$5.0B) | 94 | 51 | |
| 32 | 9.6B USD | 64 | 62 | |
| 33 | 4.5B USD | 62 | 44 | |
| 34 | 3.6B USD | 61 | 85 | |
| 35 | 4.3B USD | 61 | 60 | |
| 36 | 6.8B USD | 60 | 70 | |
| 37 | 548.8B JPY (≈$3.7B) | 60 | 79 | |
| 38 | 6.0B AUD (≈$4.0B) | 59 | 57 | |
| 39 | 87.1B CNY (≈$12.2B) | 58 | 66 | |
| 40 | 93.4B NOK (≈$8.9B) | 57 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score