Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MGRT · against 494 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #33 of 495 · scores higher than 94% of peers · safety percentile 95
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)53 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including MGRT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | MGRT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 481 reported | 0.04× | 0.22× | 78% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 476 reported | Not reported | 0.80 | — | — | 33% |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 490 reported | 4.88× | 1.84× | 88% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 3 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 4 | 2.0B USD | 99 | 45 | |
| 5 | 1.9B USD | 99 | 34 | |
| 29 | 1.7B USD | 95 | 34 | |
| 30 | 2.3B EUR (≈$2.5B) | 95 | 35 | |
| 31 | 14.6B CNY (≈$2.0B) | 95 | 63 | |
| 32 | 12.2B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 95 | 38 | |
| 33 | 1.6B USD | 95 | 72 | |
| 34 | 10.0B CNY (≈$1.4B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 35 | 7.0B CNY (≈$980M) | 94 | 27 | |
| 36 | 4.41T KRW (≈$3.2B) | 94 | 66 | |
| 37 | 201.5B JPY (≈$1.4B) | 94 | 76 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score