Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MGA · against 129 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #14 of 130 · scores higher than 88% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score8 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including MGA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | MGA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 128 reported | 4.3% | 4.6% | 45% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 132 reported | 19.3% | 7.8% | 90% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 71 reported | 19.0% | 5.6% | 100% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 125 reported | 69.8% | 26.4% | 82% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 2 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 4 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 5 | 70.6B CNY (≈$9.9B) | 92 | 52 | |
| 12 | 1.40T JPY (≈$9.5B) | 87 | 61 | |
| 12 | 1.82T JPY (≈$12.4B) | 87 | 57 | |
| 14 | 4.66T JPY (≈$31.7B) | 82 | 61 | |
| 14 | 1.67T JPY (≈$11.4B) | 82 | 62 | |
| 14 | 16.8B USD | 82 | 46 | |
| 17 | 198.5B CNY (≈$27.8B) | 79 | 70 | |
| 18 | 114.3B HKD (≈$14.6B) | 77 | 70 | |
| 19 | 2.26T JPY (≈$15.4B) | 76 | 69 | |
| 20 | 216.5B HKD (≈$27.7B) | 74 | 76 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score