Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Mistras Group, Inc.
How Mistras Group, Inc. stacks up
MG · against 961 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
85/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #134 of 962 · scores higher than 85% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score91 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including MG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 85?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.2% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 93% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 133.8% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 968 reported | 5.2% | 2.7% | 59% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 662 reported | 133.8% | 2.8% | 94% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 957 reported | 2.3% | 3.3% | 47% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.9B CNY (≈$682M) | 100 | 44 | |
| 1 | 6.6B NOK (≈$625M) | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 518M EUR (≈$570M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 5 | 4.4B CNY (≈$611M) | 99 | 40 | |
| 134 | 524M USD | 85 | 28 | |
| 134 | 8.57T IDR (≈$531M) | 85 | 71 | |
| 134 | 7.9B SEK (≈$786M) | 85 | 70 | |
| 134 | 2.4B BRL (≈$432M) | 85 | 64 | |
| 134 | 643M USD | 85 | 59 | |
| 145 | 4.9B CNY (≈$689M) | 84 | 44 | |
| 145 | 8.4B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 84 | 51 | |
| 145 | 90.5B JPY (≈$615M) | 84 | 77 | |
| 145 | 5.2B CNY (≈$725M) | 84 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score