Ranked #27 of 57 · scores higher than 50% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
9 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including MFG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 36?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its book yield, which is weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a higher price relative to book value (P/B): weaker than 68% of peers. Book yield: 62.1% vs peer median 79.5%
●Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 7.4% vs peer median 7.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MFG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
MFG
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 58 reported
7.4%
7.9%
44%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 12 reported
Not reported
11.0%
—
—
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 24 reported
Not reported
12.0%
—
—
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 56 reported
62.1%
51.8%
65%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
