Ranked #51 of 77 · scores higher than 34% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
3 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including MFC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
A mix: stronger return on equity, but weaker return on assets than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a lower return on assets: weaker than 77% of peers. Return on assets: 0.5% vs peer median 1.2%
▲a higher return on shareholders' equity: stronger than 65% of peers. Return on equity: 13.3% vs peer median 10.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MFC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
MFC
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 61 reported
27.5%
12.8%
75%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 6 reported
Not reported
33.8%
—
—
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 77 reported
0.5%
1.0%
20%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 77 reported
13.3%
14.0%
42%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 80 reported
50.8%
0.0%
92%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
