Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
META · against 142 other Communication Services companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #94 of 143 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score17 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including META · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Communication Services peers.
| Metric | META | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 140 reported | 3.7% | 3.0% | 54% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 144 reported | 5.9% | 9.3% | 30% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 131 reported | 2.2% | 7.4% | 25% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 138 reported | 14.2% | 46.8% | 27% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 2 | 4.4B USD | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 730M USD | 97 | 67 | |
| 4 | 442M USD | 96 | 79 | |
| 4 | 669M USD | 96 | 80 | |
| 90 | 2.3B USD | 37 | 33 | |
| 93 | 313M USD |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 26 |
| 94 | 4.29T USD | 35 | 68 |
| 94 | 3.1B USD | 35 | 41 |
| 94 | 1.84T USD | 35 | 66 |
| 97 | 1.2B USD | 34 | 36 |
| 97 | 5.1B USD | 34 | 39 |
| 97 | 640M USD | 34 | 46 |
| 100 | 3.9B USD | 32 | 50 |