Ranked #74 of 84 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
13 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including MET · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 17?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its book yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a higher price relative to book value (P/B): weaker than 85% of peers. Book yield: 42.9% vs peer median 79.5%
▼lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 81% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.3% vs peer median 7.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MET, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
MET
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 84 reported
5.2%
7.9%
14%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 23 reported
6.9%
11.0%
14%
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 39 reported
24.3%
9.1%
84%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 82 reported
42.7%
60.1%
15%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
