Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score
12 peers with a growth score of 10–19, including MET · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 14?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, which is weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 87% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -12.4% vs peer median 16.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MET, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
MET
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Revenue growthHigher is better · 84 reported
8.7%
6.1%
67%
Context only
Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 80 reported
-12.4%
12.3%
9%
100%
3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 81 reported
4.3%
8.7%
15%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
