Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to MercadoLibre, Inc.
How MercadoLibre, Inc. stacks up
MELI · against 35 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
94/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #5 of 36 · scores higher than 86% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score6 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including MELI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 94?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 63% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -9.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 97% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 40.4% vs peer median 4.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 97% of peers. Revenue growth: 46.0% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MELI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MELI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 36 reported | 46.0% | 8.6% | 94% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 31 reported | -9.3% | 5.9% | 23% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 36 reported | 40.4% | 9.6% | 94% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MELI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 79.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 3 | 73.8B EUR (≈$81.2B) | 98 | 58 | |
| 4 | 4.05T INR (≈$48.6B) | 97 | 53 | |
| 5 | 79.4B USD | 94 | 46 | |
| 5 | 84.3B USD | 94 | 53 | |
| 7 | 458.9B HKD (≈$58.7B) | 82 | 53 | |
| 7 | 114.1B USD | 82 | 91 | |
| 7 | 2.15T MXN (≈$116.3B) | 82 | 87 | |
| 10 | 57.0B USD | 81 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score