Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Medifast, Inc.
How Medifast, Inc. stacks up
MED · against 176 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #174 of 177 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score28 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including MED · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 99% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -37.7% vs peer median 4.3%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 98% of peers. Revenue growth: -36.0% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MED, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MED | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 182 reported | -36.0% | 0.7% | 2% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 87 reported | Not reported | -12.9% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 176 reported | -37.7% | 0.7% | 2% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MED| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 2 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 3 | 38.1B JPY (≈$259M) | 98 | 88 | |
| 4 | 201.0B KRW (≈$145M) | 96 | 81 | |
| 4 | 14.6B INR (≈$175M) | 96 | 68 | |
| 172 | 1.4B MXN (≈$78M) | 3 | 20 | |
| 174 | 722M HKD (≈$92M) | 0 | 16 | |
| 174 | 1.9B CNY (≈$259M) | 0 | 19 | |
| 174 | 1.9B CNY (≈$266M) | 0 | 2 | |
| 174 | 141M USD | 0 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score