Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Medline Inc.
How Medline Inc. stacks up
MDLN · against 588 other Healthcare companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
84/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #38 of 589 · scores higher than 94% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score27 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including MDLN · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 84?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.4% vs peer median 0.0%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2522.4% vs peer median 1.5%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.1% vs peer median 4.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MDLN, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MDLN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 577 reported | 2.3% | -4.3% | 74% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 578 reported | 5.3% | -0.8% | 71% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 553 reported | Not reported | -2.3% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 587 reported | 38.7% | 25.9% | 65% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MDLN| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 256M USD | 98 | 80 | |
| 2 | 595M USD | 96 | 97 | |
| 2 | 433M USD | 96 | 81 | |
| 2 | 289M USD | 96 | 57 | |
| 2 | 810M USD | 96 | 69 | |
| 34 | 97.5B USD | 87 | 67 | |
| 35 | 1.2B USD | 85 | 52 | |
| 35 | 4.3B USD | 85 | 69 | |
| 35 | 3.6B USD | 85 | 43 | |
| 38 | 45.9B USD | 84 | 61 | |
| 38 | 1.5B USD | 84 | 65 | |
| 40 | 1.4B USD | 83 | 73 | |
| 40 | 126.1B USD | 83 | 62 | |
| 40 | 748M USD | 83 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score