Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Moody's Corporation
How Moody's Corporation stacks up
MCO · against 21 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
67/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #6 of 22 · scores higher than 71% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score10 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including MCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 67?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 11.7% vs peer median 7.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 64% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 13.9% vs peer median 10.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 72% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 35.8% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = MCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | MCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 22 reported | 11.7% | 11.1% | 57% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 22 reported | 35.8% | 26.2% | 71% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 21 reported | 13.9% | 11.9% | 75% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around MCO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 88.7B USD | 84 | 39 | |
| 2 | 477.0B HKD (≈$61.1B) | 75 | 60 | |
| 3 | 81.4B USD | 72 | 54 | |
| 4 | 6.04T INR (≈$72.4B) | 70 | 60 | |
| 5 | 43.6B GBP (≈$56.7B) | 69 | 48 | |
| 6 | 70.1B USD | 67 | 45 | |
| 6 | 87.2B USD | 67 | 49 | |
| 8 | 70.0B USD | 65 | 53 | |
| 8 | 141.3B USD | 65 | 52 | |
| 10 | 90.7B USD | 63 | 33 | |
| 11 | 96.0B USD | 62 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score